Final · 9 May 2026

Sean Strickland defeats Khamzat Chimaev by decision

UFC 328: Chimaev vs. Strickland

9 May 2026 · Newark, New Jersey, US

Decision

View fight recap

Chimaev vs Strickland — Middleweight Title Fight · UFC 328

What happened

The result, the defining moments, and what the verdict means.

Chimaev controlled the opening frame with wrestling, but Strickland defended the next two takedown attempts and took top position in the second.

The third and fourth rounds were contested on the feet, with Chimaev landing heavier individual shots and Strickland answering with greater output.

Strickland edged the split decision, handing Chimaev the first professional loss of his career.

Watch

More from this fight.

More videos · 6 clips
Fight highlights — UFC 328
Signature moments
Fight highlights — UFC 328
Signature moments

Who Called It?

How the analysts' picks held up once the cage door closed.

Result
Strickland def. Chimaev
Dec
Upset

Analyst picks: MMAPREDICTIONGURU called it; The MMA Guru missed; We Want Picks missed; TheWeasle missed; Bedtime MMA missed; HopperoMMA missed; Lucas Tracy missed; Michael Bisping missed; Demetrious Johnson missed; Kyle Anthony missed; DFS By The Numbers missed.

Only 1 of 11 called the upset.

The experts above are a lens, not credentials we conferred — analyst, fighter or betting desk.

Full analyst picks ↓
MMAPREDICTIONGURU AnalystBetting desk called 15 of 25 MMAPREDICTIONGURU: predicted Strickland · KO/TKO · R4. Actual Strickland · Dec. Result: Hit.

Makes Strickland the value upset pick, arguing he has a clear striking edge, can punish Chimaev if the fight gets extended, and could finish late if Chimaev gets desperate.

Track record: winner called in 15 of 25 resolved picks, 7 a perfect call.

The MMA Guru Analyst called 44 of 65 The MMA Guru: predicted Chimaev · to win. Actual Strickland · Dec. Result: Miss.

Backs Chimaev despite openly wanting Strickland to win — doesn't trust Strickland's takedown defence to keep him off the mat.

Track record: winner called in 44 of 65 resolved picks, 16 a perfect call.

We Want Picks Betting desk called 55 of 87 We Want Picks: predicted Chimaev · to win. Actual Strickland · Dec. Result: Miss.

Chimaev's wrestling is just too dominant; sees Strickland losing on control time.

Track record: winner called in 55 of 87 resolved picks.

TheWeasle Analyst called 34 of 48 TheWeasle: predicted Chimaev · to win. Actual Strickland · Dec. Result: Miss.

Goes with the heavy favourite — Strickland's upright stance invites the takedowns Chimaev lives on.

Track record: winner called in 34 of 48 resolved picks, 14 a perfect call.

Bedtime MMA Analyst called 67 of 99 Bedtime MMA: predicted Chimaev · Sub · R3. Actual Strickland · Dec. Result: Miss.

Chimaev's grappling is too much for Strickland to stop — a round-three submission, in the mould of Khabib–McGregor.

Track record: winner called in 67 of 99 resolved picks, 28 a perfect call.

HopperoMMA Analyst called 41 of 65 HopperoMMA: predicted Chimaev · Sub · R1. Actual Strickland · Dec. Result: Miss.

Chimaev shoots immediately, gets it to the floor and submits Strickland in the first.

Track record: winner called in 41 of 65 resolved picks, 15 a perfect call.

Lucas Tracy Analyst called 21 of 32 Lucas Tracy: predicted Chimaev · Decision. Actual Strickland · Dec. Result: Miss.

Chimaev's wrestling controls all five rounds for a 50-45 decision, à la the Du Plessis fight.

Track record: winner called in 21 of 32 resolved picks, 8 a perfect call.

Michael Bisping AnalystFighter called 12 of 20 Michael Bisping: predicted Chimaev · to win. Actual Strickland · Dec. Result: Miss.

Bisping has leaned Chimaev all week and, despite growing respect for Strickland's elite cardio, strength and ability to get back up, his gut still says Chimaev gets it done. He concedes he could be wrong and that the longer it goes the more it favours Strickland.

  • A gut pick — admits he could be wrong
  • Chimaev's one-shot power vs Strickland's five-round cardio
  • Strickland's big weight cut flagged as a late-fight factor
“I think Khamzat Chimaev gets the job done.”

Track record: winner called in 12 of 20 resolved picks, 1 a perfect call.

Demetrious Johnson AnalystFighter called 9 of 15 Demetrious Johnson: predicted Chimaev · to win. Actual Strickland · Dec. Result: Miss.

DJ predicts a dominant Chimaev finish: Chimaev takes everybody down, and while Strickland has never been manhandled or out-grappled, DJ believes Chimaev can be the one to do it — via the submission game from dominant position rather than ground-and-pound.

  • Predicts a dominant finish (method left unspecified)
  • Chimaev out-grapples and takes everyone down
  • Must manage his gas tank or fade late
“I am going to predict a finish for Khamzat Chimaev, and he's going to be dominant.”

Track record: winner called in 9 of 15 resolved picks.

Kyle Anthony Betting desk track record building — 3 resolved Kyle Anthony: predicted Chimaev · Sub. Actual Strickland · Dec. Result: Miss. Note: A betting handicap on WagerTalk's UFC 328 show.

Kyle Anthony sees Chimaev's elite, top-notch wrestling, explosiveness and physicality as too much: Strickland gets stuck on the back foot defending takedowns instead of working his jab and volume, then takes risks getting up and gives up his back, where Chimaev finds the finish.

  • Off the -590 moneyline, likes Chimaev by submission at +110
  • Strickland has no power to scare Chimaev — death by accumulation
  • Lost both Du Plessis fights where wrestling was a factor
“Getting off the minus-590 number, I do like Chimaev by submission, which is sitting at plus 110.”

* A betting handicap on WagerTalk's UFC 328 show.

Track record builds as we verify their past calls.

DFS By The Numbers Betting deskAnalyst called 60 of 88 DFS By The Numbers: predicted Chimaev · Sub · R1. Actual Strickland · Dec. Result: Miss.

He expects Chimaev to wrestle immediately, force Strickland into defensive scrambles, and find the back before the fight can settle into a long striking match.

“So I'm going Hamzat Chimaev. I'm going to take him to win this fight by first round submission.”

Track record: winner called in 60 of 88 resolved picks, 23 a perfect call.

Archive Pre-fight material — kept for transparency.
Chimaev Strickland
  1. OutputSig. strikes landed / min 4.01 5.98
  2. Striking def.Striking defense 52% 61%
  3. DurabilitySig. strikes absorbed / min 2.98 4.53
  4. Takedown def.Takedown defense 88% 69%
  5. FinishingFinish rate 80% 52%
15-0-0
Record
31-7-0
4-1 last 5
Recent formRecent formWin–loss record over the fighter’s last five bouts, newest first, as carried in their UFC/FightMetric career stats.
3-2 last 5
32
Age
35
1.88 m
Height — Chimaev leads
1.85 m
191 cm
Reach — Strickland leads
193 cm
Orthodox
StanceStanceWhich side a fighter leads from — a striking term, not a religious one. Orthodox: right-handed, left foot and hand forward (the common default). Southpaw: the mirror image, right side forward (usually a left-hander). Switch: changes between the two during a fight.
Orthodox
80%
Finish rateFinish % — Chimaev leadsFinish rateThe share of a fighter’s wins that ended inside the distance — by KO/TKO or submission — rather than going to the judges’ scorecards. Higher means more finishes.
52%
6
Wins by KO/TKOKO/TKO wins — Strickland leads
12
6
Wins by submissionSub wins — Chimaev leads
4
4.01
Sig. strikes landed / minStrikes / min — Strickland leadsSignificant strikes landed per minuteAverage number of significant strikes a fighter lands for every minute of fight time — a read on striking output and pace. From UFC/FightMetric career stats.
5.98
2.98
Sig. strikes absorbed / minAbsorbed / min — Chimaev leadsSignificant strikes absorbed per minuteAverage number of significant strikes a fighter takes for every minute of fight time. Lower is better — it means they get hit less often. From UFC/FightMetric career stats.
4.53
52%
Striking defenseStrike def. — Strickland leadsStriking defenseThe percentage of opponents’ significant strikes that do not land — strikes slipped, blocked or evaded. Higher is better. Not the same as striking accuracy, which counts your own strikes that land. From UFC/FightMetric.
61%
88%
Takedown defenseTD def. — Chimaev leadsTakedown defenseThe percentage of opponents’ takedown attempts that are stuffed. Higher means harder to put on the mat. From UFC/FightMetric.
69%
9:52
Avg. fight timeAvg. timeAverage fight timeThe mean length of the fighter’s bouts (minutes:seconds) — a rough read on whether they tend to finish early or go the distance. From UFC/FightMetric.
16:16
Russia
Nationality
United States
TKMMA Fit, Akhmat MMA
Team
Millennia MMA · Rancho Cucamonga, California

Career stats per UFC.com; recent form is each fighter's last five bouts. Numbers reflect records coming into fight night. Bars compare each stat on a fixed scale; the “Edge” marker flags the leading corner where the gap is meaningful. The snapshot plots five career rates — output, striking defense, durability (strikes absorbed, inverted), takedown defense and finish rate — each normalised on its own scale.

Pre-fight analysis — how we saw it going in

Case for Chimaev

Chimaev's championship route was the same one that carried him through the division: immediate level changes, mauling top pressure and enough front-foot offense to force Strickland into reactive defense. If he could win the first wrestling exchanges cleanly, the fight would tilt toward his pace and physicality.

Case for Strickland

Strickland's answer was attrition. He needed to stay upright often enough to drag Chimaev into long striking stretches, touch him with the jab for five rounds and force the champion to keep shooting without getting easy control time in return.

What We Were Watching For

  • How much early control does Chimaev get from his first takedown sequences?
  • Can Strickland's jab and stance discipline make the fight feel long instead of frantic?
  • Which man is dictating the fence minutes: Chimaev with mat returns or Strickland with stubborn escapes?

Fighters

Comments

Comments are currently closed while we finish moderation and privacy controls.